So I've been looking for stock price patterns, especially that BaDaBoom pattern. I needed a spreadsheet that moved a 1-year window through ten year's worth of stock prices, like so: Then, armed with coffee and patience, I scan the prices, looking, looking. Where IS that winning pattern? One-of-these-days ... Click! |
Thursday, December 31, 2009
Stock patterns
Labels:
Stock patterns
Wednesday, December 30, 2009
Avatar
Lori & Jay invited us to an iMax to see Avatar. We expected to be impressed by the 3D graphics. We were. But even the story was great! However, I was just a mite frustrated by having to swat all the flying bugs in the theatre. Then I realized they was part of the movie! Okay, everybody run out to your nearest 3D theatre and see Avatar. |
Labels:
Avatar
Tuesday, December 29, 2009
Down then Up
The New Year is about to begin. I'm looking for a stock that's come down big time from its High over the past couple of years and is now heading up ... big time! She's down 70% from her High in June/08 and is up over 700% from her Low of $0.39 in March/09. She's been at $11 and is now about $3. She has a way to go, right? Good bet? Who knows ... but I'll give 'er a try, eh? P.S. I already own some, but gotta get me some more ... In August/09, I mentioned that contest (where we begin with $100K in Jan.09). At the time, I had $248K. Surprise! Now that coal stock has me over $300K !! Coal makes me feel warm all over. Maybe I woulda won, eh? Here are some stocks with how far they're down from their 2-year HIGH, and how much they're up from their 2-year LOW: Note that IBM and MMM are at their 2-year high. Are y'all paying attention to the first couple, eh? (And BAC looks good.) P.S. There's a spreadsheet to play with here: http://www.gummy-stuff.org/down-up-buy.htm |
Labels:
Down then up
Monday, December 28, 2009
Santa's gift to us all
'Twas the night before Christmas, when all through the house, Not a creature was stirring, not the click of a mouse. The stocks were hung by the chimney with care In hopes that St. Nicholas soon would be there. Investors were nestled all snug in their bed, While visions of profits danced in their head. And Funds were sleeping, and Stocks in repose, They had just settled down for a long winter's doze. When out of the market there arose such a clatter, I sprang from the bed to see what was the matter. Stocks were gaining ... and Funds, the same, And old St. Nick was calling their name: "Now T, now TD, now F and BBD! On DOW, on NASDAQ, on S&P and TSE! To the top of the charts! To the top of the WALL! Now dash away, Stocks, dash away all!" |
Labels:
Santa's gift to us all
As January goes ...
January is a-coming! Some say: "As January goes, so goes the year" We interpret that to mean: If January is a good (or bad) month on the stock market, then the whole year is good (or bad). So we check out the S&P500 for the last 60 years and find this: (Click on the picture for an enlargement.) Though 2009 was an exception, it gets ya thinkin' ... |
Labels:
As January goes ...
Sick on board
We recenlty returned from a cruise. We were asked NOT to board if we had a cough. If you started coughing on board, see the ship's doctor. There were hand sanitizers everywhere. Staff were at every restaurant, directing you to use them. Staff cleaned and polished railings and handrails continuously. Yet, on cruise message boards, I note that people who caught the flu blame it (somehow) "on the ship", not the passengers. Fascinating! |
Labels:
Sick on board
Saturday, December 26, 2009
Texas snow
Remember when I noted that Heidi's ability to read a curious language enabled her to generate great stuff? Here's the stuff ... after an unusual snowfall in Texas! Kate, Anna & Ty |
Labels:
Texas snow
Friday, December 25, 2009
Happy States
T'is the season to be merry, right? So I run across a list of the "happiest" states
Hawaii is number 2? I object! Ain't that where they filmed that movie ... what was it called? Okay, what about Canada? A 2007 world survey found that Canadians stood 10th in "happiness". The Dutch were numero uno and the U.S. was 23rd. Canadians in New Brunswick were "happiest". Newfoundland and P.E.I came in 2nd and 3rd ... and they ain't got the best of economies. Alberta is Canada's "richest" province: It came in 8th. Money ain't everything, eh? "Money is better than poverty, if only for financial reasons." Woody Allen "Money isn't everything, but it ranks right up there with oxygen." Rita Davenport |
Labels:
Happy States
Thursday, December 24, 2009
Wednesday, December 23, 2009
Jensen's alpha
I recently got e-mail mentioning Jensen's alpha. It didn't ring a bell, so I search gummy-stuff.org (My memory is so lousy that I often have to do that.) Anyway, it ain't there so I google and wrote what I found, here. It's interesting, but (like most things I've written about) I don't think it's very useful. Nevertheless, it generates a number that (along with a jillion other numbers) one can add to one's arsenal in order to gauge the performance of stocks and/or funds. As Ron McEwan says in an e-mail, it gives "a better look ahead down a foggy road". Click for the big picture. Okay, wanna see magnificent J-alphas? My coal stock#1 got J-alpha = 11%. My coal stock#2 got J-alpha = 13%. My lithium stock got J-alpha = 33%. Whooeeee!! |
Labels:
Jensen's alpha
Monday, December 21, 2009
In order to retain my equity until the new year (when my New Year's resolution is to start investing again in Coal), for a while I've held a bunch of $$ in a mutual fund invested "mostly" in financials. So, today I decide to sell it all, figuring that financials (though a good place to stick my $$ till year's end) often have a good month in Dec, but not in January ... maybe: Let us pray: |
Richest countries
Based upon info here |
Labels:
Richest countries
the DOW
Once upon a time I generated a fun spreadsheet (with the help of Ron McEwan). It looked at the past month (actually 25 market days) of stock prices for, say, the DOW. Then it looked over the past ten years to see what month was similar to the current month. Then it predicts the stock evolution for the coming month. Every once in a while I drag out that spreadsheet. This is the most recent result. It shows the growth of a $1K investment in the DOW over the most recent 25 days as well as the "best" historical match (starting Jan 22, 2007): Everybuddy knows that the future is a replica of the past. Hence and therefore, I (confidently) predict that the DOW will be at 10,188.97 in a month. (I could provide more decimal places.) Did I mention that the DOW is currently at 10,328? |
Labels:
the DOW
Sunday, December 20, 2009
Languages
Okay, so I was bragging to Heidi about the fact that I knew a couple of computer languages. Languages with complicated commands like: A = B + C. Then she shows me the language that she reads: 'course, when she's finished she has something useful for our doggies and grandkids: And what do I have? |
Labels:
Languages
Friday, December 18, 2009
Thursday, December 17, 2009
stock screener (maybe)
I was hoping to find (among S&P500 stocks) something really exciting. I was disappointed. Maybe there's another, better criterion ... huh? Anyway, here's one that's way down from its 52-week high yet seems to be recovering nicely: However, I still prefer these guys. |
Labels:
stock screener
Tuesday, December 15, 2009
Monday, December 14, 2009
Friday, December 4, 2009
Wednesday, December 2, 2009
Cruise
Today we start making a list: what to bring on our upcoming cruise. I look after the important things, like my pipe, tobacco and laptop. Heidi looks after all the other, less important stuff. Once upon a time I collected all the suggestions from various cruise discussion forums: Click! Quite interesting. Bring a laptop? That's so's I can keep a diary, sorta like this. With failing memory, I figure it'd be easier to store photos and videos and stick daily events into a diary before I forget 'em. I did this while camping in Texas, where we actually had free Internet access at the campground. Though there's Internet access on the ship, it costs a bundle per microsecond ... so I'll just wait till we get home (Dec 14) to stick the diary on my website. |
Labels:
Cruise
Afghanistan, eh?
Obama makes a major speech on his Afghanistan decision. He personally contacts (in advance) leaders from Britain, France, Germany, Italy, China and Russia ... among others. That includes countries that have no troops in Afghanistan, like China and Russia. That includes countries whose troops are mostly in non-combat roles, like Germany. Uh ... but wait. Doesn't Canada have troops there? And haven't Canadian troops suffered the greatest per capita losses? Click on picture to enlarge. But hold on! No problemo! Biden will inform the Canadian Prime Minister. Then, too, Canadian troops will be moved to another region: the Arghandab district, north of Kandahar. That's a piece of cake, right? After all, it's near the Canadian Dahla Dam restoration project. But wait. That's the site of pitched battles with NATO troops - a killing field for Taliban planting roadside bombs. A region where U.S. troops have sustained heavy casualties since being assigned there earlier this year. "Good luck to the Canadian troops in Arghandab," says a University of Nebraska geographer who has mapped Afghanistan for decades, and advises the military. "It's treacherous country and there are a lot of Taliban." ------------------------- Some countries have so-called "red card" status. They agree to send troops to Afghanistan provided their troop are not in combat roles or that they are assigned to less dangerous areas. During Operation Medusa, at least 12 Canadian soldiers died because they could not get support from other national contingents because of these combat-restrictions. In 2006, France, Germany, Italy, Spain and Turkey were "red card" countries. Britain, Canada, the Netherlands and the U.S.A had major combat roles. "Hello? Mr. Biden? Are you there, eh?" |
Labels:
Afghanistan,
eh?
Ice Core Data
So I was staring at the ceiling ... thinking. I can understand how one can measure CO2 concentrations because of bubbles of trapped atmospheric gas, but how on Earth does one measure historical temperatures in a bunch of ice? It turns out that they measure isotope concentrations. Heavier isotopes will be more prevalent during colder periods, so the relative concentrations of various isotopes is a gauge of temperatures. Clever, eh? Other inclusions in ice cores can be used to measure such things as ocean volume, precipitation, chemistry and gas composition of the lower atmosphere, volcanic eruptions, solar variability, sea-surface productivity, desert extent and forest fires ... and there are some three dozen global ice core sites which seem to agree on most historical conclusions ... or is it inclusions? For example, data from two different ice cores: Click on the picture. See Global Warming |
Labels:
Ice Core Data
Tuesday, December 1, 2009
Global Warming
I reckon it's easy to agree with climatologists that our planet is warming ... and there's a correlation between CO2 levels and Temperature: Click on the chart and look at the recent increase in CO2 concentration. Current theories suggest that temperatures rise, then CO2 levels increase after a delay of maybe 800 years. The increased CO2 causes further temperature increases: a CO2 feedback. But it ain't easy to conclude that it's caused by human activity, like CO2, hydrofluorocarbon and other greenhouse gas emissions: There's sunspots activity, wobbling of the earth's axis, precession of the earth's orbit, changes in cosmic radiation, interstellar dust etc.. Now, if'n we could change all these, eh? But then there's this infamous hockey stick chart (promoted by Michael Mann, obtained from tree ring data) which appears to show a dramatic increase when humans were doing their thing:: Click on the chart Canadian mathematician Steve McIntyre has demonstrated that it's been "doctored". Then comes climategate and the manipulation (and destruction) of data by those promoting Global Warming. It'll be interesting follow the discussions at the Copenhagen Climate Conference. So why would climatologists (with scientific training and peer-reviewed publications) ... why would they corrupt their data? Could it be that research grants are then more readily available? |
Labels:
Global Warming
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)